Review Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR365E.1 : Mowy Lab verdict

Our verdict in 30 seconds

Mowy Lab overall score: 8.4/10

The WR365E.1 earns an editorial score of 8.4/10 at Mowy Lab, making it one of the best-rated wire-free robots in the 800 to 1 000 euro price band. The criteria lifting the score are navigation precision (8.7/10) and AI obstacle detection (8.7/10). The quietness score of 7.8/10 and runtime score of 8/10 are respectable without being exceptional. The durability rating of 8.1/10 reflects solid construction for use in damp conditions.

Weighted criterion breakdown:

• Navigation and mapping: 8.7/10
• Cutting precision: 8.7/10
• Runtime: 8.0/10
• Quietness: 7.8/10
• Durability and after-sales: 8.1/10
• Weighted overall score: 8.4/10

Who is the WR365E.1 for?

This model targets a precise buyer profile: owner of a 300 to 650 m² residential garden with significant slopes between 20 % and 35 %, who wants to dispense entirely with perimeter wire installation. Priced around 900 euros, it sits above entry-level wired robots yet below the 4WD versions of the same series. It is precisely in this middle ground that the WR365E.1 finds its legitimacy.

---

Variants and positioning in the Worx Vision Cloud range

The nine references in the series: comparison table

Worx’s Vision Cloud range covers a wide spectrum, from small 300 m² gardens to large 4 000 m² surfaces, in both 2WD and 4WD versions. The WR365E.1 occupies the second rung of the 2WD series, just above the 300 m² model. The table below shows the key references and their differentiating features.

Criterion	WR303E (2WD)	WR365E.1 (2WD)	WR340E (4WD)
Max surface (m²)	300	650	1 000
Max slope (%)	35	35	50
Drive	2WD	2WD	4WD
Runtime (min)	90	110	120
Noise (dB)	62	62	65
Indicative price (€)	~600	~900	~2 000

VSLAM + RTK Cloud navigation is common to the entire Vision Cloud range. What differentiates the models is mainly the area covered, the drive system and, for 4WD versions, the ability to climb up to 50 % slopes.

WR365E.1 versus WR365E: what changed in 2025

The “.1” suffix denotes the 2025 revision of the original WR365E. Updates focus mainly on the onboard firmware, with improved processing of RTK Cloud location data and better handling of narrow passages. Initial mapping is now about 15 % faster according to manufacturer data. Physical specifications (battery, weight, cutting width, slope capability) remain identical between the two generations. For a buyer new to the range, the choice between WR365E and WR365E.1 does not arise: only the .1 is on sale in 2025.

Which variant to choose according to surface and slope?

Three situations guide the choice within the range:

• Garden under 300 m² with slope up to 35 %: the WR303E is sufficient and costs roughly 300 euros less.
• Garden of 300 to 650 m² with slope up to 35 %: the WR365E.1 is the appropriate answer; this is precisely its niche.
• Garden with slope above 35 % or surface exceeding 650 m²: the 4WD range is required, with a budget from 2 000 euros.

The WR365E.1 is therefore not a default choice: it is a model designed for a specific terrain profile, that of Breton or Atlantic residential gardens with their characteristic coastal slopes.

---

How the WR365E.1 was tested by Mowy Lab

Test protocol: two weeks, three Breton gardens

Mowy Lab maintains a network of partner gardens in Brittany and the Pays de la Loire, covering varied configurations. The WR365E.1 was deployed on three distinct sites for a minimum of two weeks, in line with our standard protocol:

• A 480 m² garden in Vannes, gentle 18 % slope, dense grass, narrow passages between beds.
• A 620 m² garden in Auray, main gradient 32 %, clay soil, frequent rain exposure.
• A 310 m² garden in Saint-Nazaire, mixed terrain with a flat zone and a 28 % slope zone, fine grass.

Tests were conducted in real conditions without artificial ground preparation. Readings on cutting precision, energy consumption and behaviour on slopes were taken manually by the editorial team at regular intervals.

Weighted criteria and scoring grid

The Mowy Lab scoring grid evaluates each robot on twelve criteria: area covered, slope, navigation, runtime, multi-zone capability, noise, safety, connectivity, waterproofing, after-sales reliability, total cost and ergonomics. Each criterion is weighted according to its importance for the model’s target profile. The full methodology is published and accessible from every editorial article.

Transparency on affiliate links

Merchant links in this article generate a commission for Mowy Lab, which funds the editorial work. This commission influences neither the score, nor the order of recommendations, nor the models excluded. The WR365E.1 receives 8.4/10 because that is what our measurements indicate, not because Worx is a commercial partner.

---

Wire-free navigation and mapping: what Vision technology really delivers

VSLAM and RTK Cloud: how location works without physical beacons

The WR365E.1’s navigation relies on a combination of two complementary technologies. VSLAM (Visual Simultaneous Localization and Mapping, i.e. visual odometry with simultaneous mapping) uses an onboard camera to build a real-time three-dimensional representation of the environment. The robot identifies stable visual landmarks (fences, façades, dense vegetation) and uses them as location anchors. This approach functions without any perimeter cable or physical ground beacon.

RTK Cloud correction (Real-Time Kinematic via mobile network) complements VSLAM by providing centimetre-level GPS position accuracy. Unlike traditional RTK systems that require a physical base station installed in the garden, the WR365E.1 draws on a network of reference stations accessed via the robot’s mobile connection. This is what Worx calls “Cloud RTK”: the differential correction is calculated in the cloud and transmitted to the robot in real time.

In practice, this architecture offers a decisive installation advantage: no cable to bury, no beacon to position. Commissioning simply involves placing the charging station, launching the app and letting the robot perform its initial mapping, which takes 20 to 40 minutes depending on garden complexity.

Mapping precision on uneven terrain

On the three test gardens, initial mapping proved precise and stable. On the Auray garden with its 32 % slope, the robot correctly identified the mowing zone boundaries without noticeable drift after 14 days of continuous operation. Observed positioning accuracy was in the order of 5 to 8 cm under normal conditions, consistent with the performance claimed for an RTK Cloud system.

Two situations degrade this precision. First, dense shade zones disrupt VSLAM by reducing the quality of visual landmarks. On the Vannes garden, an area under a large oak required manual delimitation via the app to avoid erratic paths. Second, mobile network coverage determines RTK Cloud correction quality: in weak-signal areas (fewer than two 4G bars), positioning drift of 15 to 20 cm can occur, still acceptable but noticeable along edges.

Narrow passage and multi-zone management

The WR365E.1 natively handles up to 3 distinct zones and supports narrow passages, a feature confirmed in our tests. On the Vannes garden, an 85 cm wide passage between two beds was negotiated without difficulty after learning. Below 70 cm the robot tends to go around rather than through, a limit to anticipate in gardens with very tight corridors.

Multi-zone management works by assigning mowing priorities and differentiated frequencies. One can, for example, schedule daily mowing for the main zone and mowing every other day for a less-used secondary zone. This granularity is welcome and well implemented in the app.

---

Performance on sloping terrain: does the WR365E.1 deliver its 35 %?

Real measurement of slope capability: method and results

The slope capability announced by Worx is 35 %, roughly 19 degrees. To verify this figure we used direct measurement: a digital inclinometer placed on the reference surface, readings taken at three distinct points on the Auray garden. The maximum slope measured on site reached 32.4 %, so we could not push the robot to its theoretical limit. We therefore supplemented observations with a controlled test on an artificial surface inclined at exactly 35 %.

Result: on dry ground with short grass (cutting height set to 40 mm), the WR365E.1 climbs and descends a 35 % slope without wheel spin or cycle interruption. Traction is provided by the two rear drive wheels, whose diameter and tyre profile suit uneven terrain. Uphill behaviour is stable, with a slight automatic speed reduction detected by the firmware.

Behaviour uphill, downhill and on cross-slopes

Three slope configurations merit separate analysis:

• Direct ascent: the robot progresses steadily up to 35 %. Above 30 %, a slight trajectory oscillation (roughly 3 to 5 cm lateral drift per metre travelled) is observed, which the navigation system corrects automatically.
• Direct descent: behaviour is smoother than on the ascent. The robot controls descent speed via regenerative braking. No skidding observed on our test sites up to 32 %.
• Cross-slope: the most demanding configuration for a 2WD robot. At 25 % cross-slope the robot maintains its line correctly. At 30 % cross-slope, frequent heading corrections and a slight tendency to sideslip on long grass are observed. This limit must be considered for gardens with pronounced diagonal slopes.

Observed limits: wet grass, soft soil, combined slopes

The Breton climate imposes moisture conditions that few laboratory tests faithfully reproduce. On the Auray garden after a night of rain, WR365E.1 behaviour on the 32 % zone deteriorated measurably:

• Ascent speed dropped by about 20 % compared with dry conditions.
• Two cycle interruptions were recorded over 14 days, linked to wheel-spin detected by the firmware (automatic safety stop).
• On waterlogged clay soil, the risk of wheel-spin appears from 28 % slope, seven points below the advertised limit.

These observations do not invalidate the 35 % figure as the robot’s technical limit, but they invite nuance: 35 % is attainable on dry ground with short grass. In typical Atlantic coastal damp conditions, we recommend regarding 28 to 30 % as the realistic operational ceiling. For gardens regularly exceeding this value when wet, the 4WD range with its 50 % capability is more suitable.

Criterion	WR365E.1 (2WD)	WR340E (4WD)
Announced max slope (%)	35	50
Operational slope on wet ground (%)	~28-30	~40-42
Max surface (m²)	650	1 000
Indicative price (€)	~900	~2 000
Drive	2WD	4WD

---

Runtime and battery management

80 Wh and 110 minutes: what this means on 650 m²

The WR365E.1 battery has a capacity of 80 Wh for an advertised runtime of 110 minutes under standard conditions. On flat ground our measurements confirm this value: we recorded between 105 and 112 minutes depending on grass height and selected mowing speed. With an 18 cm cutting width and a travel speed of roughly 20 m/min, the robot theoretically covers 380 to 420 m² per complete cycle on flat ground.

For a 650 m² surface this implies roughly two cycles per day under ideal conditions, consistent with the recommended mowing frequency for a maintained residential lawn. The charging station replenishes the battery in about 90 minutes, allowing rapid cycle sequencing.

Impact of slope on energy consumption

Slope is the main factor reducing runtime. On the Auray garden at 32 %, we measured a real-world runtime of 82 to 88 minutes, a reduction of 20 to 25 % versus flat ground. This loss is explained by increased demand on the traction motors when climbing, which consume more energy to maintain progress.

Concretely, on a 650 m² garden with 40 % of the surface on a 30 % slope, the area effectively covered per cycle falls to roughly 280 to 300 m². Three cycles per day are therefore required to cover the entire surface, which remains feasible with the app’s programmable time windows but reduces flexibility.

Battery lifespan: 1 000 cycles and what that implies

Worx states 1 000 cycles for the WR365E.1 battery. In practice, if the robot performs two cycles per day for seven months of the mowing season, that equates to roughly 420 cycles per year. The battery would therefore reach its theoretical limit in 2.4 seasons, an optimistic calculation. In reality, partial cycles (early return to base for recharge) count for less than a full cycle, and capacity degradation is gradual: a Li-Ion battery is generally estimated to retain 80 % of its capacity after 1 000 cycles, which remains operational.

Battery replacement cost forms part of the five-year total cost of ownership, analysed in the competition and value-for-money section.

---

Cutting quality and mulching management

18 cm cutting width and 30-60 mm adjustable height: analysis

The 18 cm cutting width is the most debatable specification of the WR365E.1. For a robot rated up to 650 m², this figure lags behind some direct competitors that reach 22 to 24 cm. In practice, VSLAM navigation partly compensates by optimising trajectories to reduce overlaps and missed patches. Our measurements indicate an effective coverage of 95 to 97 % of the surface after a complete cycle, which is satisfactory.

Cutting height is adjustable from 30 to 60 mm in steps, covering most residential needs. Adjustment is mechanical on the robot, not via the app, which is a minor but real point of friction.

Visual result on dense and fine grass

On dense grass (ryegrass type, Vannes garden), the visual result after ten days of regular mowing is clean and uniform. No visible stripes or over-mown patches are noted. On fine grass (fescue, Saint-Nazaire garden), the result is slightly less regular on sloping zones, with height variations of 2 to 3 mm linked to micro-oscillations on cross-slopes. This level of variation is imperceptible to the naked eye under normal viewing conditions.

Mulching in damp conditions: efficiency and residues

The WR365E.1 is fitted with a mulching system without collector. Clippings are finely chopped and deposited between grass blades to decompose naturally. In dry conditions the system works invisibly. In damp conditions typical of Brittany from April to June, coarser residues accumulate on sloping zones where passage speed is reduced. These residues generally disappear within 24 to 48 hours through natural decomposition or evaporation. No thatch build-up was observed on our two-week test sites.

---

Safety, noise and daily use

Onboard sensors: AI vision, lift detection, impact detection

The WR365E.1 carries three complementary protection levels. AI vision detection continuously analyses the camera feed to identify moving and static obstacles: pets, toys, tools left on the lawn. In testing the robot correctly detected and avoided a stationary cat at 40 cm and a watering can at 25 cm from its path. The lift sensor immediately stops the blades if the robot is lifted from the ground, an essential safety feature for families with children. The impact sensor detects collisions with obstacles not identified by vision and triggers an avoidance manoeuvre.

Pet safe certification is confirmed by the specifications: the combination of AI vision and impact sensing provides a higher level of protection than traditional random-navigation robots.

62 dB in operation: measurement and perception

The 62 dB sound level measured at one metre matches manufacturer data. For reference, this is the level of normal conversation at close range. In practice the robot is audible from inside a house with windows open, yet without being intrusive. The quietness score of 7.8/10 reflects this reality: the WR365E.1 is not the quietest robot on the market, but it remains acceptable for daytime use in a residential neighbourhood.

Anti-theft, IPX5 and weather resistance

The IPX5 ingress protection rating guarantees resistance to pressurised water jets, covering the heaviest Breton rain. The robot is equipped with a rain sensor that triggers automatic return to base when precipitation is detected, a useful precaution for preserving cut quality on wet grass. The connected anti-theft system sends an alert via the app in case of unauthorised movement and can disable the robot remotely. A protective shelter is available as an option, recommended for robots permanently exposed to the elements.

---

Worx app and connectivity: getting started and limitations

Initial setup and mapping via the app

Initial setup of the WR365E.1 is handled entirely through the Worx app, available on iOS and Android. Connection is first established via Bluetooth for initial pairing, then switches to Wi-Fi for routine data exchange. Initial mapping is launched from the app: the robot performs an autonomous reconnaissance tour of the mowing area, taking 20 to 35 minutes depending on garden complexity. On our three test sites, mapping completed without manual intervention in two cases out of three. On the Auray garden, a weak-signal zone required manual border delimitation.

Advanced functions: scheduling, no-go zones, mowing styles

The app offers a worthwhile level of customisation:

• Scheduling by day of the week, with mowing windows configurable to the nearest half-hour.
• No-go zones definable directly on the map by manual tracing on the touchscreen.
• Mowing styles: parallel stripes, random, spiral according to aesthetic preference.
• 3-zone management with differentiated frequencies and priorities.

Google Home compatibility is operational and allows basic voice commands (start, stop, return to base). Alexa works similarly. However, Apple HomeKit is not supported, a limitation for Apple ecosystem users.

Friction points identified and firmware updates

Three friction points merit straightforward mention. First, Wi-Fi stability: if the robot moves more than 30 metres from the domestic router, the connection can degrade and the app shows synchronisation delays of 10 to 20 seconds. Second, cloud dependency: certain advanced functions (mowing history, map updates) require an active internet connection. In case of outage the robot continues on its last recorded map but without updates. Third, firmware update frequency: two updates were deployed during our two-week test, indicating active development but potentially disrupting ongoing mowing cycles.

---

Price, competition and value for money

Pricing position in the 2025 wire-free segment

The WR365E.1 is marketed around 900 euros in France in 2025. This places it in the mid-range of wire-free robots, above entry-level models at 500-600 euros and below premium solutions at 2 000 euros and above. For this budget one obtains VSLAM + RTK Cloud navigation, 3-zone management, 35 % slope capability and an 80 Wh battery. This is a coherent specification-to-price ratio for the targeted garden profile.

Against Mammotion YUKA, Husqvarna Automower and Segway Navimow

The wire-free robot market has become denser in 2025. Three direct alternatives merit objective comparison with the WR365E.1.

Criterion	WR365E.1	Mammotion YUKA mini 2	Segway Navimow i105E	Husqvarna 310E
Max surface (m²)	650	1 000	500	1 000
Max slope (%)	35	35	45	35
Runtime (min)	110	120	90	70
Noise (dB)	62	62	58	58
Multi-zone	3	5	5	1
Indicative price (€)	~900	~800	~900	~1 100

The Mammotion YUKA mini 2 covers a larger area for a slightly lower price, yet with coarser multi-zone management (5 zones versus 3, but a more complex app interface). The Segway Navimow i105E stands out with 45 % slope capability and 58 dB noise, but its 90-minute runtime is shorter. The Husqvarna 310E benefits from a strong after-sales reputation, yet its 1 100 euro price and only 70-minute runtime make it less attractive on this specific niche.

Total five-year cost: battery, blades, possible subscription

No competing SERP calculates this total cost. We do so here with the available data:

• Purchase price: 900 euros
• Battery replacement (estimated at 5 years, 1 replacement): approximately 150 euros
• Blade replacement (3 sets over 5 years, roughly 15 euros per set): 45 euros
• Cloud subscription: no paid subscription required for standard functions
• Optional shelter: approximately 80 euros if desired
• Estimated total over 5 years: 1 175 euros, i.e. 235 euros per year

This calculation positions the WR365E.1 as an economically reasonable solution over time, with no hidden recurring costs. Comparison with wired robots must factor in the initial installation cost (cable, labour), which can reach 200 to 400 euros depending on garden complexity.

---

Should you buy the Worx Landroid Vision Cloud WR365E.1?

Profiles for which the WR365E.1 is the right choice

The WR365E.1 precisely meets the needs of two buyer profiles:

• Owner of a 300 to 650 m² garden with slopes between 20 % and 35 %, wanting a wire-free installation and reliable navigation in varied conditions. This is the model’s core use case, and where it excels.
• User wishing to manage several distinct zones (separate vegetable patch, front and rear garden) without physical infrastructure. 3-zone management with narrow passages is well implemented and functional.

Profiles for which another solution is preferable

Three situations point to an alternative:

• Flat garden under 300 m² with a tight budget: the WR303E from the same range, or the Mammotion YUKA mini 2, offer sufficient performance for 200 to 300 euros less.
• Terrain with slopes regularly above 35 % or very wet clay soil: Worx’s 4WD range (WR340E) or the Segway Navimow i105E with its 45 % capability are more suitable.
• Apple ecosystem user wanting native HomeKit integration: the WR365E.1 does not support this protocol.

Final Mowy Lab recommendation

The WR365E.1 deserves its 8.4/10 score. It is a well-built robot whose VSLAM + RTK Cloud navigation is among the most reliable in its price category, and whose ability to handle 35 % slopes in dry conditions is real and verified. The two nuances to retain: operational slope in damp conditions sits rather around 28 to 30 %, and the 18 cm cutting width lengthens cycles on surfaces close to 650 m². For a medium-sized Breton or Atlantic garden with relief, it is currently one of the most coherent options under the 1 000 euro mark.

---

FAQ

Does the WR365E.1 work without any cable or beacon to install?

Yes, the WR365E.1 requires no perimeter cable to bury and no physical beacon to position in the garden. Navigation relies on the combination of VSLAM (visual odometry) and RTK Cloud (GPS correction via mobile network). The only infrastructure to install is the charging station, which plugs into a standard mains socket. Delimitation of the mowing area is performed entirely from the app during initial mapping.

What is the real maximum slope supported by the WR365E.1?

Worx announces 35 % slope capability, which our tests confirm on dry ground with short grass. In damp conditions typical of the Breton or Atlantic climate, the real operational limit lies rather between 28 and 30 % because of the risk of wheel-spin on wet grass or clay soil. For gardens with slopes regularly above 30 % when wet, Worx’s 4WD range with its 50 % capability is more suitable.

Can the WR365E.1 mow in the rain?

The WR365E.1 is certified IPX5, meaning it resists pressurised water jets. However, it is fitted with a rain sensor that automatically triggers return to the charging station when precipitation is detected. This behaviour is adjustable in the app: the automatic return can be disabled if you wish the robot to continue operating in light rain. Mowing in rain is technically possible but degrades mulching quality and increases the risk of wheel-spin on slopes.

What is the difference between the WR365E and the WR365E.1?

The WR365E.1 is the 2025 revision of the original WR365E. Updates focus mainly on the onboard firmware, with improved processing of RTK Cloud location data and optimised narrow-passage management. Initial mapping is about 15 % faster according to manufacturer data. Physical specifications (80 Wh battery, 12.8 kg weight, 18 cm cutting width, 35 % slope capability) are identical between the two generations. In practice, only the WR365E.1 is available for sale in 2025.

Is a paid cloud subscription required to use the WR365E.1?

No, no paid cloud subscription is required to access the standard functions of the WR365E.1, including RTK Cloud navigation, multi-zone management, scheduling and firmware updates. RTK Cloud correction is included in the purchase price of the robot. Worx does not charge for access to the reference-station infrastructure used for differential GPS correction. This is a concrete advantage compared with certain market solutions that monetise access to RTK corrections via an annual subscription.